Advertisement

marketing to children

Cap'n Crunch Has Five Years to Live

New government regs will limit how sugary, fatty, unhealthy food is marketed to kids.



Cap'n Crunch Has Five Years to Live

Marketers may find it harder to get kids interested in sugary cereals...5 years from now.

RODALE NEWS, EMMAUS, PA—Food marketing to children would be a totally different ball game if Cap'n Crunch advertised carrots or whole-grain crackers, or if the Lucky Charms leprechaun advertised fruit, not fruit-flavored marshmallow cereal. But we don't live in that kind of world. According to a 2008 government study, breakfast cereals, restaurant foods, and snack foods represented approximately 70 percent of food marketing expenditures directed to children under 12. For teenagers, that same percentage was spent on carbonated sodas, restaurant foods, and other non-carbonated sugary drinks. And those dollars work. Research from Texas A&M University has found that, annually, more than $100 billion in food and beverage purchases are influenced by children, as are half of all cold cereal purchases.

A few weeks ago, the government finally stepped in to rectify this advertising imbalance. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) published new guidelines on food marketing to children that are designed to reign in the ever-expanding universe of advertisements, advertisement-focused games, text messages, Facebook pages…the list goes on and on.

THE DETAILS: Though the new guidelines are voluntary, it's likely that food companies are going to comply. "If companies don't agree to do this voluntarily after they've had some time to incorporate the changes, there will probably be more support for the government to step in and make them mandatory," says Jennifer Harris, director of marketing initiatives at the Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, which studies food marketing.

The FTC is proposing fairly basic principles. The commission's guidelines—which give companies five to 10 years to comply—are that any foods marketed to children between the ages of 2 and 17 "make a meaningful contribution to a healthful diet" and "contain limited amounts of nutrients that have a negative impact on health or weight (saturated fat, trans fat, added sugars, and sodium)." In order to meet the first criteria, foods that are marketed to this particular age group have to contain food from at least one of the following categories: fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fat-free or low-fat (1%) milk products, fish, extra lean meat or poultry, eggs, nuts or seeds, and beans. And they have to meet certain nutritional criteria: less than 15 percent calories from saturated fat, 0 grams of trans fat, no more than 13 grams of added sugars, and no more than 210 milligrams of sodium per serving.

The guidelines also cover virtually every venue that companies have been come to dominate—20 categories of advertising, marketing, and promotional activities that include not just TV and print advertising, but also social media, online games that serve as advertisements, text messages, product placement in movies and video games, and a variety of other electronic marketing gimmicks that have cropped up lately.

WHAT IT MEANS: The unusually long time frame the companies have been given has drawn the most ire from the public health community. And Harris says that a more ideal time frame would have been something like three years, rather than five. "It's not like this is a new concept to food marketers," she says. "They've heard the concerns about the products they're marketing to children, and they've said that they're improving them."

Aside from that, however, she's encouraged by what the FTC is doing. "The guidelines are really strong and a great step in the right direction," she says. "They really address the major issues that current self-regulation doesn't." She's referring to the industry's current food marketing initiative, the Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative, which was launched in 2005 and currently has 17 companies (among them, General Mills, McDonald's, and Coca Cola) pledging to improve food marketing for "better for you" foods. "These companies have developed their own advertising criteria," she says, "and most of them are basically just tweaking their current product lines to make them slightly lower in fat or lower in sugar." One study from the University of Arizona found that 68.5 percent of marketing to children from these companies was for their least nutritious products. The FTC guidelines, she says, spell out specific nutritional criteria that need to be met so companies can't hide behind vague "better for you" descriptions.

Published on: May 13, 2011
Updated on: May 15, 2011



More from our Authors

Learn how much happier and healthier you can be WITHOUT sugar ruining your life!

nice

Hemp Bars also make the perfect snack food, will affect positively the glycemic index of cereal, as well as leave you with a good feeling that you have eaten something good. But the DEA is in charge of hemp growing. We should all write them and tell them we are going to vote them out next election.
Pass4sure 000-106 \Pass4sure 1z0-515 \Pass4sure 642-681 \PK0-003 \pass4sure 642-357 \Pass4sure 642-975 \ Pass4sure LX0-101\Pass4sure PW0-104 \

Nice work!

I am speechless. This is a fantastic site and very engaging too. Excellent work! That’s not really much coming from an amateur publisher like me, but it’s all I could think after enjoying your posts. Not like other site. You really know what you’re talking about too. So much that you made me want to explore more. Your blog has become a stepping stone for me, my friend. Thanks for the detailed journey.
OG0-093
1z0-048
1z0-051
117-301
1z0-451
HP0-D07
JN0-643
000-203

hi

This is why the USA has an obesity problem. I work at an Phoenix web design firm and I saw a lot of articles on this. Over 30% of the US's population is obese! You do the math and then say that "Leave my Captain Crunch alone". Americans should start to eat healthier not just junk food!

OY SUSANt52

You say that parents should make better decision yet you CHOOSE TO FEED YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN A CEREAL THAT IS LOADED WITH SUGAR.... A better decision would be a cereal that is lower in sugar than Capt Crunch is.

Comparison

Just for comparison sake, let's compare the big, bad Captain Crunch (CC) against something good for you - Cracklin' Oat Bran (COB)...

Calories: CC-110 , COB-200
Fat: CC-1.5 , COB-7
Sat Fat: CC-1 , COB-3
Sugars: CC-12 , COB-15
Sodium: CC-200 , COB-150
Carbs: CC-23 , COB-35
Fiber: CC-1 , COB-6
Protien: CC-5 , COB-4

Based on those numbers, we should have a war on Captain Crunch and prosecute anyone in possesion of it. [/sarcasm]

Capt Crunch

Why can't they follow some of the other companies and reduce the sugars rather than stop making Capt Crunch?

Cap'n Crunch

No one is telling anyone how to feed the people who live in your house. This legislation is geared towards advertisers and is meant to curb those outside your family who are trying to influence your family's eating habits. Families DO have the right to feed their children whatever they want, regardless of how unhealthy that food may be, and this legislation would do nothing to change that. Advertisers, on the other hand, shouldn't have the right to pander to children.

Captain Crunch

Honestly, my children were raised on Captain Crunch and my grandchildren love the cereal. I don't think anyone, especially someone with the government that hopefully in 4 years won't even have a job, has the right to tell me how to feed the people that live in my house. We eat a well balanced diet with fruits, vegetables, very little meat and yes, we even eat sugar. One one of us is diabetic and he doesn't eat a lot of sugar, never has. His diabetes is hereditary and yes, I know that will be passed down to my children and my grandchildren. We are aware of what we have to do, we watch out for the problems, but we all feel as though we are doing what is needed.
Parents should be making better decisions. You go to the grocery store and anyone on food stamps is buying nothing healthy and they can afford to - it's just easier not to.
The government does not have the right to tell me how to feed my family if they are not paying for it and we do not, nor do we ever intend to, depend on the government hand to feed us.
We have our garden which will feed us this year.
In other words, Leave My Captain Crunch alone.

VIDEOS

FREE DOWNLOAD!
Download a FREE chapter from The Exercise Cure and learn how to get your daily dose of the world's most effective preventive medicine. Click here for your FREE copy!





Advertisement
Free Newsletter
Sign up for the FREE daily newsletter and get useful tips to keep yourself, your family, and the planet healthy and thriving.

  The Daily Fix
Authoritative reporting on the latest developments in health, food, and the environment

  Maria's Farm Country Kitchen Newsletter
Get cooking tips, learn about healthy living and even raising chickens—Maria does it all!



Your Privacy Policy

BE SOCIAL WITH US!